Monday, October 21, 2019

Readings Prize spotlight: Q&A with award winner Alice Robinson for her cli-fi novel from Australia THE GLAD SHOUT

 After a catastrophic storm destroys Melbourne, Isobel flees to higher ground with her husband and young daughter. Food and supplies run low, panic sets in and still no help arrives. To protect her daughter, Isobel must take drastic action.

The Glad Shout is an extraordinary cli-fi novel of rare depth and texture. Told in a starkly visual and compelling narrative, this is a deeply moving homage to motherhood and the struggles faced by women in difficult times.
  • ''The Glad Shout''

Alice Robinson

Winner of the Readings Prize for New Australian Fiction 2019

After a catastrophic storm destroys Melbourne, Isobel flees to higher ground with her husband and young daughter. Food and supplies run low, panic sets in and still no help arrives. To protect her daughter, Isobel must take drastic action.

The Glad Shout is an extraordinary novel of rare depth and texture. Told in a starkly visual and compelling narrative, this is a deeply moving homage to motherhood and the struggles faced by women in difficult times.


https://www.readings.com.au/products/26461742/the-glad-shout

Readings Prize spotlight: Q&A with Alice Robinson
https://www.readings.com.au/news/readings-prize-spotlight-qanda-with-alice-robinson

Sunday, October 20, 2019

SEE COVER REVEAL HERE! The November 2019 issue of popular literary magazine #MCsweeneys will feature 10 ''cli-fi'' short stories with an introduction penned by NRDC director Susan Casey-Lefkowitz

SEE COVER REVEAL HERE! The November 2019 issue of popular literary magazine #MCsweeneys will feature 10 cli-fi short stories with an introduction penned by NRDC director Susan Casey-Lefkowitz .@caseylefkowitz (but her Twitter feed has been inactive since May 2019

#CliFi via ''The Cli-Fi Report'' cli-fi.net

GLOBAL AUTHORS INCLUDE:

Tommy Orange of USA
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/14/books/native-american-authors-indigenous-day.html?smid=tw-nytbooks&smtyp=cur

Rachel Heng of Singapore
@rachelhengqp
Writer 📚 Novel SUICIDE CLUB 🇬🇧 & 🇺🇸 + translations / Fellow at the Michener Center for Writers
Austin / Singapore • rachelhengqp.com

Luis Alberto Urrea of Mexico
https://electricliterature.com/pulitzer-finalist-luis-urrea-recommends-five-books-that-arent-by-men/


Kanishk Tharoor of India @kanishktharoor

@kanishktharoor


Swimmer Among the Stars (FSG, Picador, Aleph etc) / Museum of Lost Objects / Senior Editor

Elif Shafak of Turkey @elif_safak

@Elif_Safak


Yazar, Romancı, Hikâyeperest 📚Author, Novelist, Storyteller
 

Mikael Awake @awakemik

Asja Bakic of Croatia @asjaba         @asjaba
https://www.asymptotejournal.com/blog/2019/06/19/review-of-mars-by-asja-bakic/

Birna Anna Bjornsdottir of Iceland

@BjarturVerold

 

 



Abbey Mei Otis of USA https://electricliterature.com/dan-chaon-recommends-a-story-about-a-town-infected-by-progress/

Claire G. Coleman of Australia @clairegcoleman

  



The November 2019 issue of popular literary magazine will feature 10 cli-fi short stories with an introduction penned by NRDC director Susan Casey-Lefkowitz .


https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/author/susan-casey-lefkowitz/#gref

Susan Casey-Lefkowitz

''For over 25 years, I have worked with partners from around the world as an environmental advocate. At NRDC, I have moved from working internationally to helping guide all of our work in the United States and around the world. I’m proud to fight beside our many partners around the world and here at home on behalf of people and the environment.'' Follow her on twitter @CaseyLefkowitz

2019 has been the year of over 10 special cli-fi magazine issues, from Guernica to High Country News, to Amazon, to many others! It's in the air!

Timothy McSweeneyVerified account

@mcsweeneys 

 

Mik Awake‏ @AwakeMik
A peek at next month’s ''climate fiction'' issue of McSweeney’s, for which I wrote an angry prayer on migration  titled "THE GOOD PLAN"  


  


The Twitter feed of McSweeney's Quarterly Concern, McSweeney's Internet Tendency, & McSweeney's Books.
San Francisco, CA

Will a 1960s-like Counterculture Emerge in the 2020s?

Will a 1960s-like Counterculture

Emerge in the 2020s?

News at Home
tags: American History, 1960s, counterculture, Protest

Shares



Walter G. Moss is a professor emeritus of history at Eastern Michigan University a Contributing Editor of HNN. For a list of his recent books and online publications click here. His most recent book is In the Face of Fear: Laughing All the Way to Wisdom (2019), which treats humor from a historical perspective.


 
In the 1960s, if you opposed racism or American killing in Vietnam, there was a counterculture to support you. Music, films, TV, clothing, hairstyles, social thinking, speech—a whole web of interrelated phenomena existed to help you oppose the dominant culture, “the system,” or the “establishment.”
 
Today we have just as much reason to protest as did the 1960’s dissidents. The Trump presidency, our climate crisis, and our senseless gun violence are alone enough to fuel a whole counterculture of outrage. But where are our balladeers like Bob Dylan and Joan Baez, our concerts like Woodstock, our plays and films like Hair and The Graduate?
 
We are social creatures, and most of us are followers rather than leaders. Like fish in water, we need a sustaining element to surround us. We need a counterculture, or an opposing culture or way of life, to embolden our emotions and imaginations. 
 
The counterculture of the 1960s was not perfect. It had its unthinking followers, its biases, its over-generalizations—like “Don’t Trust Anyone over 30”—yet it provided a strong alternative to the dominant consumer culture. Why did it disappear and where today is any new counterculture?
 
Mainly, that of the 1960s died because it lacked deep and sustaining roots. It was fueled by college students, civil rights activities, and opposition to the war in Vietnam. But students graduated and were absorbed into the “system,” into the tentacles of corporate America, where countercultural values and “hippie” styles were unwelcome. Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK) was killed in 1968, depriving the civil rights cause of its most powerful leader. (That year also produced the assassination of Robert Kennedy and the election of Richard Nixon.) Finally, American troops were withdrawn from Vietnam and the military draft ended in the early 1970s.  
 
What followed in the 1970s and 1980s was the disappearance of the 1960s counterculture and the absorption of many of its former adherents into the “system.” In his Bobos In Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There (2000), conservative columnist David Brooks wrote: “We’re by now all familiar with modern-day executives who have moved from S.D.S. [a radical student organization that flourished in the 1960s] to C.E.O. . . . Indeed, sometimes you get the impression the Free Speech Movement [begun 1964 at the University of California, Berkeley] produced more corporate executives than Harvard Business School.” 
 
In his The Culture of Narcissim (1978) historian Christopher Lasch identified a new type of culture that had arisen. It stressed self-awareness. But, unlike the counterculture of the 1960s, it did not oppose the capitalist consumer culture of its day, but rather meshed with it, goading “the masses into an unappeasable appetite not only for goods but for new experiences and personal fulfillment.”
 
Many of the former youth protesters of the 1960s participated in this “mass consumption,” as the growing consumer culture sold mass entertainment in new formats (including for music, films, and books) to young adults. 
 
The last quarter century have brought little relief from our culture of consumption and narcissism. One of the period’s most notable changes has been the expansion of the Internet and social media. In her highly acclaimed These Truths: A History of the United States, historian Jill Lepore stated that “blogging, posting, and tweeting, artifacts of a new culture of narcissism,” became commonplace. 
 
Although some have argued that the Internet has promoted a greater sense of community, Lepore is far from alone in emphasizing its encouragement of narcissism. In 2017, for example Newsweek stressed it in a piece entitled “Is Rampant Narcissism Undermining American Democracy?” Moreover, the previous year Americans chose for their president perhaps the most narcissistic and materialistic man to ever hold the office—Donald Trump.
 
Many Americans, however, oppose Trump. What prevents the emergence among them of a new counterculture to oppose him and the crass materialism he represents? 
 
For one thing, the college students of today are vastly different than those of the 1960s, and so too is higher education. It is much more expensive; more students incur large debts to pay for it; and a much lower percentage of students major in the humanities. Meanwhile, our consumer culture continues to prompt aspirations to earn a “good salary,” and there are scant ways of doing so outside of our dominant corporate culture. We need money not only for food, cars, and houses, but also for things many younger people want like computers, Internet services, cell phones, and an increasing variety of leisure activities. 
 
Moreover, stimulants like the 1960s civil rights struggles and opposition to the Vietnam War (and the draft) are gone. They can no longer galvanize young people. Yet, there remains one great hope, one phenomenon that could help a new counterculture burst forth—our present environmental crisis. Regardless of 2020 political results, this new birth could occur. 
 
Such a counterculture could develop out of seeds planted by individuals like the German/English economist and environmentalist E. F. Schumacher and Kentucky writer Wendell Berry, plus two more recent seed-planters, 350.org founder Bill McKibben and Pope Francis. Moreover, now in 2019 there are signs that such seeds are beginning to sprout. 
 
Schumacher was a hero to many of those influenced by the original protest movement of the 1960s. Indeed one of them, Theodore Roszak, who wrote The Making of a Counter Culture (1969), also authored the Introduction to Schumacher’s popular 1973 work Small Is Beautiful.  
 
In it and other works of the 1970s, Schumacher criticized modern industrial societies for “incessantly stimulating greed, envy, and avarice,” for preparing people to become “efficient servants, machines, ‘systems,’ and bureaucracies,” and for driving the world toward an environmental crisis. Instead of focusing education on career preparation in such societies, he believed it should help us answer questions like “What is our purpose in life?” and “What are our ethical obligations?” 
 
Four years after Schumacher’s death in 1977, Wendell Berry gave the first Annual E. F. Schumacher lecture. In it he praised Schumacher’s adherence to spiritual values. In 1983, in his essay “Two Economies,” Berry quoted Schumacher’s belief expressed in  “Buddhist Economics” that the aim of such an economics should be “to obtain the maximum of well-being with the minimum of consumption.” In his 2012 Jefferson LectureBerry suggested that our corporate capitalist consumer culture remained dominant and heavily implicated in our present climate crisis.
 
The 2009 Schumacher lecture was delivered by Bill McKibben, one of the USA’s “most important environmental activists.” That same year, along with Berry, he  protested at a coal-fired power plant near Capitol Hill in Washington D.C. The previous December, the two men had sent out a letter noting the global-warming danger of continuing reliance on coal—the “only hope of getting our atmosphere back to a safe levels . . . lies in stopping the use of coal to generate electricity.” In September 2019, McKibben’s 350.org co-organized a massive global climate strike involving 4 million people in 163 countries.  
 
In 2015, McKibben lavishly praised Pope Francis’s environmental encyclical and ended his essay writing, “This marks the first time that a person of great authority in our global culture has fully recognized the scale and depth of our crisis, and the consequent necessary rethinking of what it means to be human.”
 
In the encyclical itself, the pope stated, “the problem is that we still lack the culture needed to confront this crisis,” and there is an “urgent need for us to move forward in a bold cultural revolution.” And like other critics of modern narcissism, he bemoaned “today’s self-centred culture of instant gratification,” and of “extreme consumerism.”
 
Thus, Schumacher, Berry, McKibben, and Pope Francis all share the essential view that today’s consumer culture needs to be replaced by one featuring, in the pope’s words, a “spirituality [that] can motivate us to a more passionate concern for the protection of our world.”
 
The cultural critic Raymond Williams once wrote that “a culture, while it is being lived, is always in part unknown, in part unrealized.” Hence, we may not yet realize that the four individuals mentioned above have been seed-sowers for an emerging new countercultural movement. But there are some promising signs.
 
Regarding music, one recent article notes: “2019 has been a year of youth climate strikes and record-setting heatwaves, and—probably not coincidentally—it’s also the year that pop music stars started speaking about climate change en masse. . . . Now we’re seeing actual, quality pop music talking about the climate crisis from artists like Billie Eilish, Lana Del Rey, and (he claims) Lil Nas X.”  
 
In film, Paul Schrader’s First Reformed (2017) was a first rate exploration of the effects of climate change on an environmental activist and his minister (Ethan Hawke). 
 
Literature has produced more numerous examples of climate concern. Berry, author of novels, poems, and essays, has long written about the health of the earth and planet, and in recent decades about climate change (see, e.g., here and here). It is difficult to think of any other major American cultural figure who for so long has championed the type of values needed for a countercultural challenge to today’s consumer culture.  
 
In 2000, prolific fiction writer T. C. Boyle’s A Friend of the Earth depicts the world in 2025-26: “Global warming. I remember the time when people debated not only the fact of it but the consequence. . . . [Now] it’s like leaving your car in the parking lot in the sun all day with the windows rolled up and then climbing in and discovering they’ve been sealed shut—and the doors too. . . . That’s how it is.”
 
In 2018, as the new literary term of cli-fi gained traction behind the PR work for climate activist Dan Bloom at The Cli-Fi Report, Amazon Editions published a collection of seven climate-fiction (cli-fi) stories by major writers. The series was entitled “Warmer.” 
 
In 2019, Amitav Ghosh came out with his new cli-fi novel Gun Island, the plot of which centers on global warming and its foolish denial.
 
In September 2019 another well-known novelist, Jonathan Franzen, wrote about the coming of a “climate apocalypse.” 
 
Among poets, already in 1985 Carl Dennis wrote the amazingly perceptive “The Greenhouse Effect.” More recently, the influential Poetry Foundation has gathered together “environmental poetry [that] explores the complicated connections between people and nature, often written by poets who . . . are serving as witnesses to climate change while bringing attention to important environmental issues and advocating for preservation and conservation.” The Foundation collection also includes essays on ecopoetry, an important new trend dealing with climate change and other environmental topics. 
 
In the early 1960s, Bob Dylan (Nobel Prize for Poetry winner in 2016) composed and sang “The Times They Are A-Changin’.” It began: 
 
Come gather 'round, people
Wherever you roam
And admit that the waters
Around you have grown . . . .
 
In light of the rising sea levels produced by global warming, the lines remain relevant  today. So too do his words
 
Come Senators, Congressmen
Please heed the call
Don't stand in the doorway
Don't block up the hall.
 
A new counterculture could help lessen such blockage. As Schumacher, Berry, McKibben, and Pope Francis have all indicated it can embrace many traditional values while still being progressive and forward looking. But, as Francis, indicates it must reject our unsustainable “throwaway” consumer culture.

Any Opinion on Climate Strikes Should Not Matter… Unless Given by A Person Participating in It

Any Opinion on Climate Strikes Should Not Matter…
Unless Given by A Person Participating in It
As a researcher and a writer interested in observing things and exploring them, I am caught between Climate Strikers and their Critics and feel a bit dizzy not knowing where to look or where to stop.


My verdict?

The Climate Strikers win this time round, because their narrative centres around science and climate justice and not on interpreting or counter-arguing someone else’s perspective.

The question that haunts me now is – is the resistance to Climate Action shifting from Climate Scepticism to leaning on Climate Strike Scepticism?

What can be done to ensure that this does not happen?

At an individual level, the answer for me is writing about it. So here it goes…


The Global Climate Strike has already created a momentum in Climate Change Awareness like no other human endeavour has. The likely reason for this is that it is supported by youth and people who have less of hidden agendas and vested interests than others. Although their logic considers money and politics, it does not centre everything else around it.
The first thing everyone must understand and respect is that the strikes are not happening because of compulsion from some outside authority. They are voluntary and self-motivated in nature. Hence, they are personal too, and have lots of stories behind them.
It is an appeal and demand from people who are going to spend the rest of their lives dealing with the crisis. It involves people of any age group who sleep with anxiety and wake up with the apprehension of what they may have to face next. That should be considered in any narrative addressing the movement, regardless of the narrative’s leanings.
It is unfair to target specific individuals in a people’s movement. The movement should be judged for the purpose it is trying to achieve and not for other things which it does not address. The movement is one way to draw attention to solutions and changes required to face the bigger global issue we are all experiencing. It does not even claim to be the only one solution. And yet, it has already proven its mettle.
The terms ‘Climate Justice’ and ‘Uniting behind Science’ and recognising the current circumstances as a ‘Climate and Ecological Crisis’; all appear to be fair claims given the facts and current climate impacts. The movement has helped bring these universal issues to the forefront. People from different regions have united for a common cause and are expressing their concerns and solidarity. It may be noted that, most of them are also involved in individual and community actions when they are not striking. However, they also have a realisation that the momentum required for urgent action is much larger than what an individual or some scattered efforts can achieve.
If one looks at majority of narratives against the Climate Strikes, they are not coming from co-sufferers or co-strikers, but from people who depend upon media or secondary information to know about the strikes. Unfortunately, they are missing on the most authentic source: the people involved, as well as social media, where the Strikers express their thoughts. 
Nevertheless, the mere fact that people are noticing the demands made by the Climate Activists, irrespective of whether they are supporting or opposing them, marks the success of the movement.
I sincerely recommend just 3 considerations for anyone writing or reporting about Climate Strikes or Climate Strikers –
  1. Empathise with the agony of the individuals who are going to spend the rest of their lives (sometimes, 75% or more) worrying about and facing unprecedented climatic events.
  2. Participate in the strikes near you to understand the points raised by the strikers and converse with them to learn and share the knowledge that exists.
  3. Give, at least, some benefit of doubt to the Climate Strikers, that they may know more or have a better realisation than what they are given credit for.
Any comment, criticism or compliment which is given after these 3 considerations will ensure a more robust analysis of all the aspects of the movement.
This Climate Movement is big enough to survive on its own, even in the face of criticism. However, it will be a loss to anyone who cares for people or environment to not use its momentum or make it stronger with personal wisdom.
As an individual who has attended three Climate Strikes, the only recommendation I would like to give the Climate Strikers is –
You are going to face steeper hurdles as the movement grows bigger, so sharpen your knowledge of the global and local context to strengthen your cause. Once the movement accelerates Climate Action, this will also help you distinguish between the bad, the good and the best climate-friendly activities.
Ultimately, more than on which Climate Action one chooses, our survival as a species and as a society will depend on whether or not we are able to recognise a crisis and act on it. 

Saturday, October 19, 2019

A climate change oped


                                              Daniel Zeigler

AN OP-ED




By  Daniel Zeigler 
OCTOBER 22, 2019




“Climate Change is the most important issue we face,” according
to the Secretary General of the U.N., Antonio Guterres. Richmond
Times reported on, Oct. 18, 2019, that Climate Change will not be on
the agenda at the 2020 G-7 Summit, according to the Trump White
House. If Trump gets his way, the World’s most important leaders
will meet in 2020, and not deliberate on the most perilous problem
in the World, today. Mr. President, we respectfully tweet: ‘you are
an idiot.’
In this article, the Times reported that ‘France, Italy, Japan,
Canada, Great Britain and Germany are raising concerns that Climate
Change will be left out of the meeting.’ These leaders have
apparently read the tea leaves from their alarmed and protesting
citizenry. The Times article quoted the French Finance Minister,
Brun Le Maire, as stating: “the first matter of concern for our
populations in Europe and the U.S. is Climate Change; I really think
that the responsibility of the most powerful states around the world
is to address the issue of concern to our populations.” Le Maire asks
additionally, “What would the relevance of the G-7 summit be, if
these leaders did not address the most important topic of the day?”
Can we vote this Minister in as our new, prescient President?
If Webster was fishing for a new illustration of absurd, it couldn’t
do better than Trump’s indifferent idiocy about Climate Change. His
improvident vision for America borders on derelict madness, or
maybe worse, dereliction of duty(by the Commander and Chief no
less). He kept the discussion of Climate Change out of this year’s G-
7 Summit, too. Incredulously, he also pulled out of the Paris Climate
Accord before that; and intends to increase production of fossil fuels,
which any fool knows, drives Climate Change.
The severity of the Climate Change crisis could not be greater. A
consortium has been organized, just recently, called Covering
Climate Now, consisting of 250 newsrooms in 32 countries, with a
combined reach of 1 billion people, to attempt to ameliorate this
monstrous problem. Apparently, from what Trump has not done
about Climate Change, it will take the sound speakers used by
Metallica, placed in the oval office, to get his seemingly blinded
attention.
What sign from above is Trump waiting for? Nine out of the ten
hottest days have occurred during the last 15 years, with records
going back to 1880. One might suppose that Trump’s plan is for all
of us to go to the beach on the really hot days.
What about the dire concerns of our globally radicalized youth;
radicalized because, as Greta Thunberg, the sixteen-year-old


Swedish Climate Activist said, to the leaders of the world, “you have
failed us.’ With those words we can understand why the terrified
youth of the world are marching, everywhere, as fervently as they
are tossing and turning in their tremulous dreams. Once again,
Thunberg, the vociferous tribe’s spokesperson, said caustically and
ever so sadly, “you have stolen my dreams.”
She bluntly railed, from the U.N. pedestal, against the leaders of
the world, with a pugnacious grimace, repeatedly saying, “How dare
you,” fail to act on our behalf. Her plaintive howl was for a judicious
resolution to Climate Change. She was implicitly saying, we are your
children: ‘remember you do not inherit the Earth from your
ancestors; you borrow it from your children.’ Let us in the U.S. make
a chorus of Thunberg’s chant: ‘How dare you, Trump, ignore the
sinking ship of state, and the children on it, as the sky fills with
carbon dioxide.’
As I have already said, Thunberg is from Sweden, and after
listening to her speak, a cross between Alice in Wonderland and
Margret Thatcher of Great Britain, pint-size with a petite
comportment, her visceral anger is all the stature she needs; she
may have been from the land of neutrality but she is not neutral; she
is a fierce opponent of mankind’s complacency. Trump, you may
have impulsively withdrawn from Syria, but you are not going to be
able to retreat so recklessly from addressing Climate Change. If
nothing else, Thunberg will expose your poisonous lassitude like
Rachel Carson did pesticides.
That’s a weapon against Climate Change we don’t have yet, an
expose like Silent Spring. The lack of legislative action is the cry of
the youth in the streets. Silent Spring was published in September
of 1962, and by the end of the year, 40 bills had been introduced in
State Legislatures for the regulation of pesticides. Shakespeare
wrote that some of the slings and arrows of outrageous
fortune(youth’s treacherous birthright) were the law’s delay and the
insolence of office. Silent Spring made swift inroads against both of
those resistances to progress. Trump, your obstructions to fighting
Climate Spring now, when it is achievable, and your
contemptuousness of the youth who are not waiting any longer for
action, is not less than a crime against humanity, which will
cripplingly haunt your legacy, if nothing else does, first.
Winston Churchill said at the start of WWII, a war not unlike our
engagement with Climate Change: “We shall fight in the seas and
oceans; we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength
in the air, and defend our (land), whatever the cost may be; we shall
fight on the beaches, fight in the fields and streets, fight in the hills;
we shall never surrender.” Trump, the children of this world are not
waiting for you to act. They have their marching orders. They will
march on your White House like the conquering soldiers they intend
to be, and fulfill the words prophetic words of Churchill: “I have…full
confidence that if all do their duty, if nothing is neglected, and if the
best arrangements are made…we shall prove ourselves…able to
defend our(homes) and to ride out the storm(we face)…and outlive
the menace of (climate change).”

AUTHOR ID: Daniel Zeigler is working on a cli-fi novel-in-progress about climate change risks and issues and he hopes his book will be received by readers and critics as a new kind of ''SILENT SPRING'' [by Rachel Carson] about climate change. He lives is Virginia.

YEONSIL KANG professor at Drexel University

Blade Runner 2019 - Seoul
Two chapters on reading the 2 blade runner movies as cli-fi

@kangyeonsil

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/mythical-lost-city-gods-discovered-20649754

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/mythical-lost-city-gods-discovered-20649754

A scholar teaching in Taiwan is presenting a paper on The Handmaid's Tale and its adaptations at an Atwood conference in Chicago in November.

MMLA 2019 — CHICAGO

 

According to the Margaret Atwood Society,  a scholar working in Taiwan is presenting a paper on The Handmaid's Tale and its adaptations at an Atwood conference in Chicago in November.



Conference will be November 14-17, 2019

at the Hilton Chicago,

the Atwood Society-sponsored panel will be Saturday the 16th at 1:00.


Panel Title: Duality & Doubles in Margaret Atwood


Organizer: Denise Du Vernay, Loyola University Chicago


This panel seeks to explore the complexity of Atwood’s characters and works through the lens of the MMLA’s theme for 2019: “Duality, Doubles, and Doppelgängers.”



Other presenters will be discussing The Handmaid’s Tale and the MaddAddam trilogy.

Interview with a ghost writer [from 2013]



QUESTION: In a literaray magazine essay you wrote in 2013, you noted that ''the signs are everywhere that the climate in which human civilization developed is gone, seems a natural subject for fiction, and a number of recent novels have grappled with it—Nathaniel Rich’s “Odds Against Tomorrow,” Barbara Kingsolver’s “Flight Behavior,” and Ian McEwan’s “Solar” among them." What inspired you or motivated you to approach this subject way back then when very few literary critics or culture observers were talking about this topic?

ANSWER:

QUESTION: Then you opined, and again, it was July 2013, still early days:

"These books have been labelled “cli-fi,” but chances are that the name won’t stick. It makes the genre sound marginal, when, in fact, climate change is moving to the center of human experience.''

What inspired you to make such a premature judgment about cli-fi [''CHANCES ARE THAT THE NAME WON'T STICK''] ....when the genre term was still just in its infancy in pop culture mentions and opeds? Do you regret now, 6 years later, having written that premature pronoucement 6 years ago, and if so, why do you regret it?

ANSWER:

QUESTION: Was that essay assigned to you by your editor at that magazine where at the time you were not a staff writer as you are now, but at that time a contributing writer and not on staff per se? Or did you come up with the idea of the essay yourself and pass it by your editor to get their greenlight and see if the magazine would publish it?

ANSWER:

QUESTION: Looking back now, what would you say about cli-fi today, in 2019? The name obviously did stick, and why do you think it did stick?


ANSWER:

Friday, October 18, 2019

The first-ever cli-fi novel about Greta Thunberg is being written as we speak. Here's the first few pages.

 
 
The first-ever cli-fi novel about Greta Thunberg is being written, as we speak.
Here's the first few pages....by a friend of this blog. I must keep their name private for now. But read this first part, it's interesting and it points to a future direction of YA cli-fi novels and adult cli-fi novels.
 
(c) 2019 AUTHOR RESERVES ALL RIGHTS
 
IF YOU ARE A LITERARY AGENT AND YOU WANT TO MEET THE AUTHOR BY EMAIL, I HAVE THEIR CONTACT DETAILS AND THEY ARE INTERESTING IN TALKING ABOUT GETTING THIS NOVEL IN PROGRESS PUBLISHED.
 
===================
 
TEXT BEGINS:
 
“How dare you,” Greta Thunberg growled, didactively perturbed,
her ponytail and pugnacious grimace alternatingly confusing her
audience with dizzying irony. Which was she: warrior or waif?

Benjamin Humeman stared in disbelief at the diminutive figure
railing cogently from a United Nations pedestal. The hugeness of
the U.N. amphitheater swallowed Greta like the maw of Jonah’s
whale.
 
She was only as tall as the people rapidly shrinking in their
seats. But her visceral anger was all the stature she needed, and she
commanded it like a predator. Despite her petite comportment, her
alarming presence was the fin of a shark circling in the crowd.

Benjamin knew little about her. He had seen her arrive in America on
the borrowed racing sailboat she used to cross the Atlantic, to reduce her carbon
footprint, instead of flying on a jet from Sweden.
 
Reducing your
footprint over the sea: that was a way to walk on water these days.

Like the solitary student she had been sitting outside the Swedish
Parliament protesting a lack of action on climate change, she stood
alone at the bow of the sleek sailboat, a forlorn figurehead, as it cruised to it
destination in a moonishly gray mist.

A flourishing crowd was waiting at the dock to greet her. As the
yacht sailed into the harbor, it picturesquely passed the Statue of
Liberty, which beckoned as the first in line to welcome her.

Clapping and commotion could be heard from the people gathered
along the shore to celebrate her. It was clear she was held in high
esteem.

There was excitement in the air as the young people called to her
and waved eagerly. Greta disembarked with unflappable mien. She
was obviously a consequential world citizen. But she seemed
solemn as she viewed her surroundings, her feet now securely
planted on the ground and not on an undulating deck; was she a
knowingly weary Gandhi arriving in town after a long trip: with so
many sheep to tend and just one shepherd to lead them.
 
She was only 16 and had already nominated by three Swedish politicians for the Nobel Peace prize, although she ws not to be awarded the prize in 2019. 
 
She  had a mission; she was going to march for her cause. Did she know
that in the United States she walked in the footsteps of the
legendary who changed society, just like she wanted to? Maybe her
next marvel would be to write a letter from a Birmingham jail?
Whatever course Greta chooses, she’ll be on the right track; she has
a dream.

As Benjamin watched her on the dock in New York City, speaking
to her jubilant teen fans, he was unaware of how notable she was. He
was uninformed about her being the conscience of the climate
change crusade across the globe.

MORE:


On the dock, but still unsteady on her feet(she said),snappy in a
black nautical jacket, her military-style name printed over her breast
pocket, G. Thunberg; her hair dark brown and frizzy like a soft
sparrow that has just washed itself in a mirror clear bird bath, she
spoke softly and verbalized what her followers apparently wanted to
hear: this climate fight is across countries and continents. She was a
Colossus spanning the Earth.

Benjamin did not fully understand the significance of her words,
but in one sentence the youth of the world had become singular,
united, without nationalities. And in the best sense, Greta was
unknowingly, or slowly serenely glimpsing her global role, as a
queen bee now, populating the world with golden gathering pollen
workers, who were determined to keep this green planet
blossoming, to salvage the oceans, perfume the air again,
save the land from arid desolation, to avert the apocalyptic doom, a
threat as common these days as milk on cereal; the world’s children
were grossly encumbered by their vision of the world they would
eventually inherit, they felt like hostages, knotted and duct-taped,
by thugs of the worse temperament: the evil who steal the one
innocent, inviolate childhood. We who were preceding them were
stealing everything they had, their yesterdays, todays and
Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow.

(it ) Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing. -- SHAKESPEARE


But to these children, it does mean something, it signifies something
precious they are not willing to give up; yes, they are walking shadows
under the doom of a future oppressing sun, but not poor players. They
are
on the world stage now, and they strut and fret because the outcome as
it
stands now is so grim; they are not idiots by any means, they are in fact
the
brilliant sunshine that will replace the gloom of Climate Change if given
a
chance. They are rightly full of sound and fury that echoes down the
valley
of death at this time to the last syllable of recorded time. They are our
last
hope and they know it, even if we don’t. They will not be lighted fools
on a
way to dusty death. They will triumph, persevere, preserve this world
for their children who will not have to emerge from the shadows of their
mothers’ apron strings to win back a world that had been given away
like
so much confetti over a parade on its way to nowhere, and tragically to
a
hellish funeral of all life. .

She had somehow become the conscience of the Climate Change
crusade across the globe. As she walked the dock, she was no more
than a sprite, but crowd applauded her as if she were an Uncle Sam
on stilts. She easily towered over the potentates of the
General Assembly, as she damned them for their escalation of
Ineptitude about Climate Change.

She spoke pointedly. The audience clapped for her between
comments; unaware that she was condemning everyone sitting in
amphitheater, or listening with earphones, wrapping their heads like
a vise, waiting for a translation that was going to crush them to
hear.
She was in the business of knocking heads, if that what it took to get
her message heard.

“How dare you,” she reiterated caustically. Benjamin watched
stunned on his living room television. Thoughts were running
through his head. Was an unimpeachable phenom going down the
rabbit hole of impossible odds? Was she cautioning Atlas not to
shrug the world off his shoulders any longer? Ayn Rand, you high
priestess of apathy. Greta has come to town with a fountainhead of
mitigating vision for the world to witness. She was on a dais to the
downtrodden Millennials asking who was going to save the planet?
This child was achingly tormented: like writhing wildlife clenched
between the inhuman claws of a barbaric trap.
Greta launched into a tirade of tendentious vitriol about how life
as we have known it, will not be the life as she knows it. Benjamin
watched transfixed.

Her life was not going to end with an overheating whimper on her
watch. She was roaring from her premature burial with the last
gasps of breath she could muster.

The nefariousness of climate change had transfigured her; God
could have easily said of Greta, “With her I am well pleased.”

The paucity of a childhood; vanished dreams; impotent promises;
the cruel currency of capitalism; she was infuriated, with a white-hot
rage; crying helplessly like a burning cross(without a three-cornered
hood in sight) on a sacrosanct, suburban lawn of myopic, global
yawns: she had been gutted and betrayed like Christ and a prize
buck.

This child was an orphan in front of a blindly dying world. When
her elders turned to her for hope, she told them to go to hell, or wait
for the last vestiges of Earth to melt into the Stygian river.

Benjamin marveled at her outspoken, bitter, restrained
countenance, a face as twisted out of shape as Munch’s Scream.
Munch from Munchkin land: Oz had never had such terror as Greta
was explicating or Edvard had realized.

Her words were succinct, defiant, disdaining, a determined plea
for an antediluvian deliverance(would God dare do it again): a
simple treble gospel. But in her distraught misery she was
triumphant. Surely, her words were a clanging alarm clock, the size
of Cincinnati, heard around the world.

Benjamin thought to himself, what three other words were as
sacred, determined, irresolute. He knew in a moment what those
other three words were: “We the people.” How transfigured history
had become with the prophecy from that triptych of power,
perseverance, and staggering exultation.

There was hope in her beleaguered demand(the kind that could
crack a jubilant bell); just as there had been revolution in a nascent
nation with similar christening words. Three words helped found an
enduring, almost utopian heroism against oligarchies, tyranny and
corruption: the United States.

Would Greta’s words be as convincing, as electrifying, down the
corridors of time, across the continents and rising oceans: a new
heraldry for Homo Sapiens, and the inhabitants of its dominion? She
had traveled halfway around the world to utter her words in the land
of propitious freedom.

For a precociously enraged teenager, these were cerebral curse
Words, thought Benjamin. But profanity was not all she had in her
arsenal of partisan retribution.
She had held the world’s attention for more than 15 minutes, he
reasoned.

Everyone could see that she was a Joan of Arc of the airwaves.
She was telling the world that Gaia was in a death-grip and that
egregious negligence had caused it. She blamed the correct culprits;
and they were fatally, stone-cold frozen in her crosshairs. Her petite
eyes glared exceedingly beyond their normal size like high caliber,
smooth-bore rifle barrels.

These words, her emancipatory cry, would echo in history longer
than the world had time to survive the crisis that she was surgically
annunciating.

President Trump passed her in the hallways after her speech and
ignored her like a champion dunce. Her unchecked scowl could have
assassinated him.

That night, after his daughter Keats was asleep, Benjamin walked
downstairs to his office on the ground floor of their house with a cup
of tea in his hand, steam rising from it like a miniature brush fire. It
was 8 o’clock and he couldn’t risk a cup of coffee, or he might not
get any sleep. He would be up at 3 o’clock to give Keats a warm,
white bottle of milk. His wife, Clarinda, didn’t get up at night to feed
Keats because she couldn’t get back to sleep, afterwards. He could
climb back in bed and be asleep in minutes. So, he had the
nighttime duty of feeding Keats. Any other time, Clarinda
complained; he could sleep anywhere, at any time. He could fall
asleep at a red light.

He put the cup (which was brown and white and had
Hershey printed on it) down on his desk and slumped into his dark
blue swivel chair. Benjamin rifled chocolate as quickly as poultry
scarfed chicken feed. Probably more.

Facing the computer, he clicked his mouse and the black screen
saver disappeared. What replaced it on the laptop screen was a
detailed, high-resolution photograph of an ancient scroll, unrolled to
reveal the fine artistry of meticulously drawn Egyptian pictographs,
also known as hieroglyphics. The were painted in sunshine bright
colors across the body of the scroll like a stamp collection, each
hieroglyph representing a letter of that language’s alphabet.
Benjamin worked for United States Fidelity and Surety(USF&S), a
property and casualty company that had been in business since
1896.

With a click on the computer’s favorites icon, its cache of internet
addresses flashed into view, and Benjamin scrolled to the link for
the digital NYT that he subscribed to. He clicked on it and the NYT
front page appeared instantly.

Headlines and color photographs and lead stories filled the
computer screen like a quilt of a florid menagerie. Benjamin scanned
the electric text for a story about Greta’s speech, that day at the
U.N., on climate change, but he couldn’t find one.

Still looking at the front page on the computer screen, Benjamin
cautiously with peripheral vision lifted his mug of hot tea for a sip as
he considered what to do next. As he sipped, he noted to himself
that the tea was just the right warmth(the Goldilocks’ test), rich
with Earl Grey flavor and its liquid essence was velvety as brandy.
Benjamin was a connoisseur of quality wherever he could find it.
After some thought, he assumed that her eloquence would
appear, in a review, later that night or tomorrow morning. Without a
story about Greta to read, Benjamin typed climate change into the
search box at the top of the front page to see what other stories the
NYT had written recently about this topic
.
After he clicked on the search box, a long column of story
headlines became visible on the page, with brief descriptions of the
stories beneath them. A recent article that caught his
attention was from September 18, 2019, and it was titled: Climate
Change Is Not World War. It was written by Roy Scranton.
Where Benjamin was sitting, the room was lighted by solitary,
swan-neck lamp that bathed him in fluoresce like the moon on a
black night. Beyond the light, the room was in shadows like the
gaze of Edgar Allen Poe.

In the first sentence, the firebrand, Alexandria Ocasio-
Cortez (AOC), was mentioned, and Benjamin knew of her from the
media, as the ludicrous purveyor of the Green New Deal (GND), with
Senator Edward Markey of Massachusetts, who had not been
stigmatized with the same crown of thorns(yet). Benjamin was also
familiar with the GND. He had heard the merits and faults of the GND
debated nationwide for half a year now, since it was released to the
public. It was scorned by the right, the red states, as a manifesto
with the notoriousness of Mein Kampf, it seemed. The left praised it
and hallowed it as the newest book of the New Testament. . From
what Benjamin knew about its contents, and the urgency of its
messages, he guessed both sides were wrong.

With the acrimony between both sides, what truth could one hope
to decipher? Benjamin leaned closer to the computer screen to read
the article. Peering intently, as though he were Pasteur sighting for
the first time the germs that were infecting society, he read on,
calmly curious.

According to Roy Scranton, an English professor at Notre Dame, the
pamphleteers of the new, new deal pleaded for the patriotism that
America once knew during the annuals of the Greatest Generation.
In the text of the GND, the scribes had proposed that American
citizens revive “a new national, social, industrial and economic
mobilization on a scale not seen since World War Two and the New
Deal era.”

Benjamin thought to himself that maybe this was a lost cause
right out of the gate because wasn’t it only tempting to think you
could go home again. This was a new world born of the warriors of
WWII, as much because of them, as everyone else alive. If climate
change was true, didn’t we need a new, new call to arms; the newest
of cutting-edge paradigms.

TO  BE CONTINUED.....


Shelby Featt:
I saw an ad for a Graduate Creative Writing Program at the NYU New
School for Fine Arts, yesterday.

Joshua Keenan:
Do you think that’s what you will do when you graduate?

Featt:
Not really. But it made me think about the situation we’re in with
Climate Change.

Keenan:
What do you mean?

Featt:
Suppose I wanted to be a writer. It’s two years until I graduate;
and then it will be probably be 10 years until I get published.
Keenan:
Everybody knows it takes time to carve out a career in writing.
Featt:
That’s twelve years. It’s eleven years until the tipping point with
Climate Change. And it doesn’t look like anyone is going to do
Something before then. So what’s the point? I’ll never have a
career and I’ll never grow old.
Keenan:
That’s one of the popular signs at the marches. You’ll die of old age
and I’ll die of Climate Change.
Featt:
The ad said: “Become the daring voices of a new generation.” Who
are they kidding? They haven’t looked at their thermometers lately.
There isn’t going to be a new generation; just the last generation.
Keenan:
So, if you’re going to be around, at least march, until then; write
your own sign to carry. There’s time enough for that.
Featt:
I wish it was funny. My Dad use to play an old song from the 60’s,
during Viet Nam. It was called Eve of Destruction. He’d play it over
and over again. I nearly memorized the lyrics. One of the lines
went: and marches alone won’t bring integration. Maybe marches
won’t add up to anything. Maybe it will take something else.
Keenan:
Like violence. You don’t think the civil rights laws were passed
before then.
Featt:
Maybe it always takes violence to get a stubborn point across.
Keenan:
Marches don’t mean anything. They just wear out your shoes,
sneakers. Marches are good for Nike.
Featt:
We don’t need a MFA to tell the truth to power.
Keenan:

Here’s what we can do. Write our epitaphs now and we’ll seem like
we’re dead already. And if the Earth fades into the sunset, it won’t
bother us. The Climate Change deniers have all the power and they
are going to keep it, because they have it, and they are not giving it
up for the short amount time they have left. But by then, it will be
too late for the rest of us.
 
MORE SOON

 

Saturday, October 12, 2019

live-tweeting the recent Deborah Treisman moderated New Yorker Fest panel on cli-fi novels "Dark Days Ahead"

View image on Twitter


On stage: left to right, Watkins, Jemisin, Rich, Groff, Treisman

When Deborah Treisman was 11 years old, she received her first literary rejection, for a short story she sent to the The New Yorker. Flash forward about 20 years ...


Fast forward  to a recent literary panel discussion in New York sponsored by the New Yorker Magazine Festival, an annual literary event featuring novelists and poets from many countries.

A well-attended cli-fi panel discussion on October 11, titled "Dark Days Ahead," featured novelists Lauren Groff, N. K. Jemisin, Nathaniel Rich and Claire Vaye Watkins, with the event moderated by New Yorker magazine editor Deborah Treisman.

SEE ALSO:
https://www.sdjewishworld.com/2019/10/18/remembering-his-hometown-from-across-the-world/

"Climate change and its parade of horribles is our biggest threat," Treisman said.

They took the time to tweet about the panel discussion he sat in on, quoting Nat Rich as saying: "The great climate novel may not mention weather or climate, but captures the mood of it."

He also quoted Lauren Groff as saying on stage: "Why aren't we all writing cli-fi? (Climate fiction)."

Treisman asked the panelists and the audience: "Can the stories matter?"

Claire Vaye Watkins, the author of the cli-fi novel "Gold Fame Citrus asked: ''Is there hope?''

N.K. Jemisin said: "The abuse/exploitation of resources is not new to humanity. It's just mainstream now."

Groff: ''I don't know if humans will survive."

Claire Vaye Watkins: ''Well, maybe there's something escapist in the end of the world.'' 

Lauren Groff replied: "Well that's doesn't remove our culpability in our extinction."

Nat Rich said: "There's a range outcomes in climate change. Worst case scenario is nuclear war as tensions rise. Joy!"

"But, but, but, there are range and we can talk about them as adults and accept it's not a choice between hope and despair," said another panelist quoted by Mr. Szafranski, who hails from my hometown of Springfield, Massachusetts. [Hi Matt!]

Groff said: "What if entertainment is the way to get this virus of change in our system?"

Rich: ''Climate debate has shifted from appeals to reason (to denialists) to more personal, urgent climate activists.''

Jemisin: ''Literature can ask personal questions related to climate change (e.g. should I have kids, as 
Nat Rich notes) that can have impact."

Watkins: "We're learning from our pants!"

Groff added: ''Without arts that is engaging with our world, it's not worth it. Entertainment is pushing us away from the world. Art should engage it.''

Jemisin said: "Is calling something 'disaster porn' bad? Porn can be 'disturbingly effective.' Entertainment can make a difference."

Who's who?

Dan Bloom blogs at:
https://www.sdjewishworld.com/2019/10/18/remembering-his-hometown-from-across-the-world/

Based in Florida, Lauren Groff is a frequent contributor of short stories to the magazine; her story collection “Florida,” published in 2018, won the Story Prize and was also a finalist for a National Book Award.

N. K. Jemisin, a writer of cli-fi and speculative fiction, is the author of ''The Broken Earth'' trilogy. “The City We Became,” the first novel in her new series, will be released next year.

Nat Rich is a novelist and a writer-at-large for the New York Times Magazine. His most recent book was “Losing Earth: A Recent History,” a nonfiction account of the earliest efforts to prevent catastrophic climate change. One of his other books include the cli-fi novel “Odds Against Tomorrow.”

Claire  Vaye Watkins is the author of the cli-fi novel GOLD FAME CITRUS.

Deborah Treisman has been the fiction editor of The New Yorker magazine since 2003 and has worked at the magazine since 1997. She is also the host of The New Yorker’s monthly Fiction Podcast and its weekly podcast The Writer’s Voice.

A major draw for advertisers?

[ By the way, the annual New Yorker Festival has become the biggest consumer-facing event for its parent company Conde Nast, not to mention one of the buzziest cultural events of the year, period. With speakers, performers and panelists, this year’s program reads like a who’s-who of the literary arts. But The New Yorker Festival isn’t just about must-see programming. It’s also a major draw for advertisers looking to reach the magazine's well-read audience. ]

NOTE about the Live-Tweeter:

Matt Szafranski is the Editor-in-Chief and founder of WMassP&I, 

an attorney and a writer in Springfield, Massachusetts

=========


Buck Ennis

Deborah Treisman, 32

Fiction editor, The New Yorker

When Deborah Treisman was 11 years old, she received her first literary rejection, for a short story she sent to the The New Yorker. Flash forward about 20 years, and now Ms. Treisman is doing the rejecting and accepting. As the new fiction editor of the venerable weekly, she heads up a team that sifts through some 2,000 submissions a month, searching for prose worthy of The New Yorker's reputation as a literary tastemaker.


It's a job with extraordinary clout. Even previously unpublished writers have been known to receive $500,000 book advances once they've had a story published there. "The New Yorker occupies a completely exclusive spot in the world of short fiction," says literary agent Amanda Urban.


Ms. Treisman tries not to be preoccupied with her magazine's standing among the literati. "I'm surprised by how many see it as a sacred artifact," she says. "This is a great job, but it's a job."


Her groundedness comes from having little to prove. She graduated from college at 16, and joined The New Yorker's fiction department at 27. She's the youngest person to hold the fiction editor title, and the first woman to do so since Katharine White established the department in 1925.


Ms. Treisman comes from a family of high achievers. Both siblings and both parents are noted professors. Late last year, she traveled to Stockholm to watch her stepfather, Daniel Kahneman, receive the Nobel Prize for economics. She says she easily gave up the notion of being a writer, with its life of solitude and massive hurdles to publication. "If you have a choice, it's probably not right for you," she says.


Early Life

Deborah was born and raised in the city of Oxford until she was about 8 years old. She later moved to Vancouver, Canada where she decided to suppress her English accent in order to avoid being bullied. [2]
She grew up in a family of academics and scientists. [11]

Education

At the age of 16 years old, she attended the UC Berkeley and studied liberal arts for about a year. She graduated with a degree in Comparative literature[11]

Career

During and after college, she had worked as a writer. She began her post-college career as an editor at The Threepenny Review, then earned an internship at Harper's Bazaar. [12] At 23, Treisman became the editor of Grand Street, a now-defunct quarterly literary magazine. [12]
In 2002, after an introduction to Bill Buford, she joined The New Yorker as a deputy fiction editor. When Buford left to pursue his writing career, Treisman took his place. [12] [6]

The Gatekeeper For Literature Is Changing At New Yorker ...

2002年10月21日 - New Yorker magazine editor David Remnick appoints Deborah Treisman to succeed Bill Buford as short-story editor; her standards and criteria ...

Deborah Treisman - The New York Times

2003年1月28日 - Public Lives profile of Deborah Treisman, fiction editor of The New Yorker; photo (M)